Seat at major policy meetings
The Advocate receives timely access to major policy and litigation-policy discussions and the materials needed to evaluate them.
Policy proposal
The majority elects the Attorney General. The minority keeps an independent voice.
A small, independently functioning office inside the Attorney General's structure would participate before major decisions are made, place dissent in the official record, hear grievances about the AG's office, and bring serious integrity concerns to the courts when appropriate.
The problem
The Rhode Island Attorney General is elected statewide and exercises substantial authority over criminal prosecutions, state litigation, investigations and major questions of public law. Elections properly decide who leads that office. But electoral victory does not make the constitutional concerns of everyone who voted the other way disappear.
The proposal does not create a second Attorney General and does not give the minority a veto. It creates a disciplined way for a materially different constitutional, factual or policy analysis to be heard, preserved and—when necessary—put before a court.
How it works
The pilot is designed to operate before, during and after major decisions—not merely criticize them after the fact.
The Advocate receives timely access to major policy and litigation-policy discussions and the materials needed to evaluate them.
When the Advocate materially disagrees, a written Minority Report accompanies the final decision and becomes part of the permanent official record. It may not be edited or suppressed by the Attorney General.
People who believe they were treated unfairly or improperly by the Attorney General's Office have somewhere outside the ordinary chain of command to bring the complaint.
The office can investigate credible allegations involving withheld evidence, discovery failures, Brady/Giglio-type issues, false or misleading evidence, retaliation, abuse of process, conflicts or comparable misconduct.
When an investigation concerns a pending or completed case, retained counsel may seek permission to place factual findings and relevant evidence before the court through lawful procedures. The judge retains all adjudicative power.
Where a substantial nonfrivolous competing constitutional position exists, retained counsel may seek amicus participation or intervention where applicable rules permit it.
Patterns across complaints and investigations can be identified, anonymized when appropriate, and addressed through recommendations and public annual reporting.
Every claimed fiscal benefit is tracked separately as documented savings, recoveries or estimated avoided costs so the pilot can be judged by results instead of rhetoric.
Guardrails
Pilot funding
The proposed first-stage pilot budget is approximately $950,000 per year, funded from existing Attorney General general-revenue resources legally available for reallocation rather than by diverting restricted or federal funds.
FY2027 total AG appropriation: $53,371,935. Less the $2.675 million capital item: $50,696,935. $950,000 ÷ $50,696,935 ≈ 1.87%.
| Annual pilot item | Planning amount |
|---|---|
| Five FTE personnel — planning assumption using AG average loaded FTE cost | $740,890 |
| Independent retained counsel | $125,000 |
| Specialized investigators / forensic or technical experts | $35,000 |
| Secure case systems, records, travel, public reporting and ordinary operating costs | $49,110 |
| Total | $950,000 |
Organization
The qualifications for the Minority Constitutional Advocate would be the same as the qualifications for Attorney General. Attorneys, investigators and technical experts can be retained when a particular matter requires them.
The financial test
The $950,000 figure is not presented as guaranteed savings. It is the annual performance target. The office would maintain a Taxpayer Savings Ledger distinguishing realized savings and recoveries from estimated avoided costs.
Examples of countable fiscal benefits would include documented reductions in outside legal expenses, settlements or judgments demonstrably reduced, unnecessary litigation ended earlier, recoveries obtained, and other identifiable state expenditures avoided. Estimated savings would be reported separately from realized cash savings.
Implementation
The proposal contemplates an incoming Attorney General establishing a voluntary internal pilot within existing administrative and budget authority to the extent legally permissible. The office could be given strong operational independence by written policy while the Attorney General remains the constitutional head of the department.
If the pilot proves useful, Rhode Island could then consider legislation, court-rule changes, or constitutional action as appropriate to make the office durable, guarantee its independence, and define any additional powers.
Participation before the decision.
Dissent on the record.
Independent review afterward.
Access to the courts when the law permits.
The lighter explanation
The same proposal, explained with a little Rhode Island humor.
Read more
Use the one-page summary for quick sharing and the policy paper for the full structure, functions, safeguards, budget and organizational model.
Rhode Island Constitution, Article IX §12: the duties and powers of the Attorney General remain as established or as prescribed by law.
Rhode Island Constitution — Article IX
FY2027 enacted appropriation: the Attorney General's total appropriation is $53,371,935, including $2,675,000 in capital funding.
FY2027 Rhode Island enacted appropriations
Prosecutorial disclosure duty: Rhode Island Rule of Professional Conduct 3.8(d) addresses timely disclosure of evidence or information tending to negate guilt or mitigate the offense.
Rhode Island Supreme Court Rules — Article V
Political theory: John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, on the danger of social and political majority power.
Project Gutenberg — On Liberty
This page describes a policy proposal, not an existing Rhode Island office or state program.