AI Citizen Assistance Pilot

Government should be easier to use.

Ask Hope would help Rhode Islanders find the right office, understand official information, organize their facts, and prepare clear requests—at any hour and without needing an insider.

This page describes a proposed public-service pilot. Ask Hope is not yet a live government service.

One clear front door to Rhode Island government.

Every answer should show its source and say when a person needs to take over.

What Ask Hope would do

Help people move from confusion to a usable next step.

The tool would work from verified government sources, structured intake questions, and subject-matter review for each area included in the pilot. It would not invent an office, a deadline, or a legal conclusion.

01

Find the office

Identify the state, local, or federal office that handles the issue and link to its official contact page, form, or procedure.

02

Explain the process

Translate published instructions, forms, rules, and statutes into plain language while preserving links to the original sources.

03

Prepare the request

Ask focused questions and produce a first draft of a complaint, APRA request, appeal, assistance request, or supporting-document list.

04

Escalate responsibly

Recognize urgent, dangerous, or highly individualized matters and direct the resident to a trained person or emergency resource.

Illustrative preview

Choose a common problem.

The buttons below demonstrate the proposed workflow. They do not submit information or provide a live legal answer.

Ask HopeCitizen AG Assistant · Demonstration
Source-linked
You

I need emails and contracts from a state agency. How should I ask?

Hope

I can help you identify the correct public body, narrow the records, and prepare a request using that body’s published APRA procedure.

  • Confirm the agency and approximate date range.
  • Name the people, subjects, and record types involved.
  • Request electronic delivery and a fee estimate when appropriate.
Proposed output A tailored records-request draft and submission checklist

A guided process

Ask only what is needed to get the person moving.

Residents should be able to stop, save their work, review every source, and decide whether to submit the resulting document.

  1. 1

    Describe the problem

    Use ordinary language. No agency name or legal vocabulary is required.

  2. 2

    Answer focused questions

    Hope asks for the facts needed to distinguish one office or process from another.

  3. 3

    Review the sources

    The answer links to the official page, procedure, form, statute, rule, or public guidance relied upon.

  4. 4

    Receive a usable result

    The resident gets a checklist, organized fact summary, or editable first draft.

  5. 5

    Reach a person when needed

    The system provides the correct human contact and carries forward only the information the resident chooses to share.

Useful from the first pilot

Help people comply with the law—not bury them in paperwork.

Ask Hope would begin with bounded tasks whose official sources and outputs can be tested before the pilot expands.

Agency navigation

Find the correct department, division, municipal office, or federal referral.

Permits and registrations

Map published steps for licenses, tax registrations, renewals, and required forms.

Complaint preparation

Organize dates, parties, events, prior contacts, requested relief, and supporting documents.

Public-records requests

Help residents direct a narrow request to the public body that maintains the records.

Service questions

Locate official eligibility information and the proper application or assistance channel.

Plain-language access

Explain public instructions in accessible language and support translated interfaces.

Public-service safeguards

The system must be useful without pretending to be infallible.

Every design choice should make it easier to verify, correct, and challenge the system’s output.

Sources

Show the authority

Answers display the official sources used, their dates when available, and a direct link for independent review.

Limits

Say what Hope cannot decide

The tool does not determine guilt, liability, eligibility, legal rights, or how an agency will rule.

Privacy

Collect less

Ask for the minimum information needed, warn before sensitive material is entered, and provide clear retention and deletion controls.

Review

Bring in a person

Urgent, disputed, uncertain, or high-consequence matters receive a clear route to trained staff or outside help.

Audit

Publish performance

Test referral accuracy, source freshness, accessibility, privacy, and unequal error patterns, then publish the results.

Corrections

Keep a visible record

Residents can report a bad answer, and material corrections appear in a public change history.

Nonpartisan by design

The same official answer for every Rhode Islander.

Ask Hope would not promote a party, a candidate, or an officeholder. Responses would be based on published law, official procedures, and identified records. Political affiliation would not be requested or used to shape an answer.

An independent review process should test whether similarly situated users receive materially consistent guidance.

Build it carefully

Begin with a limited pilot that can be tested in public.

The public should be able to see what the pilot covers, how often it succeeds, where it fails, and what it costs.

  1. Phase I

    Verified directory

    Connect official agency directories, contact pages, forms, and published procedures to a searchable Rhode Island service map.

  2. Phase II

    Drafting tools

    Add structured help for APRA requests, complaints, referrals, and basic government correspondence.

  3. Phase III

    Limited public pilot

    Test with real users, trained reviewers, accessibility specialists, and adversarial scenarios before wider release.

  4. Phase IV

    Public evaluation

    Publish accuracy, referral, privacy, accessibility, correction, and cost results before deciding what to add.

The Attorney General’s role

Build a dependable intake system and tell the truth about its limits.

The Attorney General can establish the tool for the office’s own services, use public sources to improve referral and complaint intake, require privacy and accuracy standards in procurement, and invite other agencies to participate.

The Attorney General cannot direct every state agency. Broader integration would require agency cooperation and, where necessary, action by the General Assembly.

A foundation already exists

Ask Hope would organize official resources—not replace them.

A better front door to government

People should not need an insider to find the right answer.

Ask Hope would show where its answers come from. When the tool is not enough, it would connect the resident with a person.